This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Barriers to data quality resulting from the process of coding health information to administrative data: a qualitative study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 November 2016
Accepted: 7 November 2017
Published: 22 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alberto Freitas|
|14 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg|
|3 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kelsey Lucyk|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg|
|18 Sep 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alberto Freitas|
|24 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kelsey Lucyk|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|22 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2697-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.