Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Barriers to data quality resulting from the process of coding health information to administrative data: a qualitative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Freitas
14 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg
3 Sep 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kelsey Lucyk
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Sep 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jürgen Stausberg
18 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alberto Freitas
24 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kelsey Lucyk
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
22 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2697-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement