This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Integrating acute stroke telemedicine consultations into specialists’ usual practice: a qualitative analysis comparing the experience of Australia and the United Kingdom
- Kathleen L. Bagot1, 2, 3Email author,
- Dominique A. Cadilhac1, 3,
- Christopher F. Bladin1, 3,
- Caroline L. Watkins2, 4,
- Michelle Vu1,
- Geoffrey A. Donnan1,
- Helen M. Dewey5,
- Hedley C. A. Emsley6,
- D. Paul Davies7,
- Elaine Day8,
- Gary A. Ford9,
- Christopher I. Price10, 11,
- Carl R. May12,
- Alison S. R. McLoughlin7,
- Josephine M. E. Gibson2,
- Catherine E. Lightbody2, 4 and
- on behalf of the VST and ASTUTE investigators
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 7 March 2017
Accepted: 7 November 2017
Published: 21 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|7 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Victoria Anne Wade|
|17 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Juhl Majersik|
|18 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kathleen Bagot|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2694-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.