This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Low uptake of Aboriginal interpreters in healthcare: exploration of current use in Australia’s Northern Territory
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 October 2016
Accepted: 7 November 2017
Published: 15 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|27 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Young-Taek Park|
|7 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christine Phillips|
|10 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jinhyung Lee|
|6 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Ralph|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anna Ralph|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2689-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.