This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
From policy to practice: exploring the implementation of antiretroviral therapy access and retention policies between 2013 and 2016 in six sub-Saharan African countries
- Julie Ambia1Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Jenny Renju1,
- Alison Wringe1,
- Jim Todd1,
- Eveline Geubbels2,
- Jessica Nakiyingi-Miiro3,
- Mark Urassa4,
- Tom Lutalo5,
- Amelia C. Crampin6,
- Daniel Kwaro7,
- Catherine Kyobutungi8,
- Natsayi Chimbindi9,
- F. Xavier Gomez-Olive10,
- Malebogo Tlhajoane11,
- Brian Njamwea8,
- Basia Zaba1 and
- Paul Mee1
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 3 May 2017
Accepted: 3 November 2017
Published: 21 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yibeltal Alemu|
|28 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lut Lynen|
|27 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Julie Ambia|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Julie Ambia|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2678-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.