This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Role of mHealth applications for improving antenatal and postnatal care in low and middle income countries: a systematic review
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 28 October 2016
Accepted: 2 November 2017
Published: 7 November 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Turnbull|
|27 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michelle Munro-Kramer|
|30 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anam Feroz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Turnbull|
|16 Oct 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Anam Feroz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Oct 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Nov 2017||Editorially accepted|
|7 Nov 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2664-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.