Skip to main content

Table 2 Acceptability of novel aspects of the PRONTO! model among PRONTO! GBM clients completing evaluation survey one and survey two

From: Trial and error: evaluating and refining a community model of HIV testing in Australia

 

Survey one

n (%)a

118 (100.0)

Survey two

n (%)a

298 (100.0)

P-valueb

The opening hours are convenient for me

 Any agree

111 (94.1)

264 (88.6)

 

 Not agree

7 (5.9)

34 (11.4)

0.09

The location of PRONTO! is convenient for me

 Any agree

94 (79.7)

227 (76.4)

 

 Not agree

24 (20.3)

70 (23.6)

0.48

I found it easy to get an appointment at PRONTO!

 Any agree

117 (99.2)

287 (96.6)

 

 Not agree

1 (0.9)

10 (3.4)

0.15

I was comfortable waiting in the consultation room with the test facilitator

 Any agree

111 (94.1)

291 (97.7)

 

 Not agree

7 (5.9)

7 (2.3)

0.07

Overall, I prefer rapid testing to conventional HIV testing

 Any agree

116 (98.3)

261 (87.6)

 

 Not agree

2 (1.7)

37 (12.4)

0.001

I found our conversation useful in regards to my sexual health

 Any agree

109 (92.4)

250 (83.9)

 

 Not agree

9 (7.6)

48 (16.1)

0.02

They managed the whole experience professionally

 Any agree

118 (100.0)

293 (98.3)

 

 Not agree

0 (0.0)

5 (1.7)

0.16

Overall, I prefer testing with a peer test facilitator rather than a sexual health doctor or nurse

 Any agree

92 (78.0)

179 (60.3)

 

 Not agree

26 (22.0)

119 (35.4)

0.001

I am likely to return to PRONTO! for HIV testing

 Any agree

113 (95.8)

279 (93.9)

 

 Not agree

5 (4.2)

18 (6.1)

0.46

I am likely to test for HIV more frequently now that PRONTO! is open

 Any agree

101 (85.6)

254 (85.2)

 

 Any disagree

17 (14.4)

44 (14.8)

0.9

  1. Any agree – agree, strongly agree; not agree – neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree
  2. aMissing excluded
  3. btwo sample z-test