Skip to main content

Table 2 Acceptability of novel aspects of the PRONTO! model among PRONTO! GBM clients completing evaluation survey one and survey two

From: Trial and error: evaluating and refining a community model of HIV testing in Australia

  Survey one
n (%)a
118 (100.0)
Survey two
n (%)a
298 (100.0)
P-valueb
The opening hours are convenient for me
 Any agree 111 (94.1) 264 (88.6)  
 Not agree 7 (5.9) 34 (11.4) 0.09
The location of PRONTO! is convenient for me
 Any agree 94 (79.7) 227 (76.4)  
 Not agree 24 (20.3) 70 (23.6) 0.48
I found it easy to get an appointment at PRONTO!
 Any agree 117 (99.2) 287 (96.6)  
 Not agree 1 (0.9) 10 (3.4) 0.15
I was comfortable waiting in the consultation room with the test facilitator
 Any agree 111 (94.1) 291 (97.7)  
 Not agree 7 (5.9) 7 (2.3) 0.07
Overall, I prefer rapid testing to conventional HIV testing
 Any agree 116 (98.3) 261 (87.6)  
 Not agree 2 (1.7) 37 (12.4) 0.001
I found our conversation useful in regards to my sexual health
 Any agree 109 (92.4) 250 (83.9)  
 Not agree 9 (7.6) 48 (16.1) 0.02
They managed the whole experience professionally
 Any agree 118 (100.0) 293 (98.3)  
 Not agree 0 (0.0) 5 (1.7) 0.16
Overall, I prefer testing with a peer test facilitator rather than a sexual health doctor or nurse
 Any agree 92 (78.0) 179 (60.3)  
 Not agree 26 (22.0) 119 (35.4) 0.001
I am likely to return to PRONTO! for HIV testing
 Any agree 113 (95.8) 279 (93.9)  
 Not agree 5 (4.2) 18 (6.1) 0.46
I am likely to test for HIV more frequently now that PRONTO! is open
 Any agree 101 (85.6) 254 (85.2)  
 Any disagree 17 (14.4) 44 (14.8) 0.9
  1. Any agree – agree, strongly agree; not agree – neither agree nor disagree, disagree, strongly disagree
  2. aMissing excluded
  3. btwo sample z-test