Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

"Maybe we should talk about it anyway": a qualitative study of understanding expectations and use of an established technology innovation in caring practices

BMC Health Services ResearchBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:657

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2587-3

Received: 24 April 2017

Accepted: 1 September 2017

Published: 15 September 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tijs Vandemeulebroucke
23 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cecilie Haraldseid
10 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jennifer Pearson
8 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Randi Stokke
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Randi Stokke
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
1 Sep 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2587-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Centre for Care Research, Gjøvik, Norway
(2)
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences - INN University, The Centre for Innovation in Services, Elverum, Norway

Advertisement