This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
"Maybe we should talk about it anyway": a qualitative study of understanding expectations and use of an established technology innovation in caring practices
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 April 2017
Accepted: 1 September 2017
Published: 15 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tijs Vandemeulebroucke|
|23 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cecilie Haraldseid|
|10 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jennifer Pearson|
|8 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Randi Stokke|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Randi Stokke|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|15 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2587-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.