Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: The developers’ perspective
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Mar 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Porter|
|13 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grigorios Kotronoulas|
|5 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bianca Wiering|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Grigorios Kotronoulas|
|10 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alison Porter|
|30 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bianca Wiering|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2582-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.