This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Perceptions of patients and providers on myocardial perfusion imaging for asymptomatic patients, choosing wisely, and professional liability
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 April 2017
Accepted: 4 August 2017
Published: 11 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Apr 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angela Koh|
|20 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sacha Bhatia|
|5 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kristopher Paul Kline|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kristopher Paul Kline|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|11 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2510-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.