This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Do expanded seven-day NHS services improve clinical outcomes? Analysis of comparative institutional performance from the “NHS Services, Seven Days a Week” project 2013–2016
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 29 April 2016
Accepted: 3 August 2017
Published: 10 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deirdre Thornlow|
|4 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Hoong-Wei Gan|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xiaoyun Liu|
|20 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deirdre Thornlow|
|16 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Hoong-Wei Gan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|10 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2505-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.