Table 2 Linguistic variables and fuzzy numbers for rating and weighting for agility
From: Agility assessment using fuzzy logic approach: a case of healthcare dispensary
Performance Rating | Importance Weighting | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Linguistic variable | Fuzzy number | Linguistic variable | Fuzzy number |
Worst (W) | (0,0.5,1.5) | Very Low (VL) | (0,0.05,0.15) |
Very Poor (VP) | (1,2,3) | Low (L) | (0.1,0.2,0.3) |
Poor (P) | (2,3.5,5) | Fairly Low (FL) | (0.2,0.35,0.5) |
Fair (F) | (3,5,7) | Medium (M) | (0.3,0.5,0.7) |
Good (G) | (5,6.5,8) | Fairly High (FH) | (0.5,0.65,0.8) |
Very Good (VG) | (7,8,9) | High (H) | (0.7,0.8,0.9) |
Excellent (E) | (8.5,9.5,10) | Very High (VH) | (0.85,0.95,1.0) |