Skip to main content

Table 5 Attributions of ‘Success’ and ‘Failure’ in relation to COAG National Action Plan initiatives

From: An analysis of policy success and failure in formal evaluations of Australia’s national mental health strategy (1992–2012)

COAG National Action Plan

Policy Lever

Policy Objective

Proposal(s)

Success

Failure

Organisation

R&SA

Improve youth mental health services

Review and consolidate existing youth mentoring and early intervention programs into a single program

Initiate new youth early intervention projects

O- Substantively met

 

R&SA

Offer increased support for carers and families of people with mental illness

Introduce a new Family Mental Health Support Service

Increase mental health respite services for carers

O- Substantively met

R- Increase in respite places

Increase in education and formal support services

 

R&SA

Greater employment and day-to-day living support for the mentally ill

Indicators 9 and 10

Increase places in day-to-day living support programs and Personal Support program

Increase number of Personal Helpers and Mentors

Introduce Disability Employment Services group

O- Substantively met

Disability Employment Services Group introduced

R- Increase in funding and service provision

R- Employment rates remain low among the target group

R&SA

Increase mental health workforce

Increase the number of supported places in university mental health degrees, particularly to Indigenous students

Specific funding targeted towards increasing Indigenous health workforce

O- Substantively met

R- Increase in supported places and scholarships for formal training

 

SS

Improve and integrate drug and alcohol services within broader mental health services

Provide additional funding to drug and alcohol service providers

O- Substantively met

R- Funding increased, grants awarded to NGOs

 

R&SA

Increase service coverage in rural/remote areas

Indicator 5

Introduce a 24-h 7 day mental health telephone service

Increase web-based mental health resources

O- Substantively met

Flexible service delivery modes introduced (telephone, online services)

 

SS

Improve coordination of care

Indicator 7

Introduce step-up and step-down community facilities

Utilise community coordinators

O- Partially met

R- Principles and implementation guidelines developed

R- Variable progress in jurisdictions

Lack of consistent approach or outcome

Lack of accountability

Regulation

SQ&E

Increase consultation between State/Territory and Federal Governments

Establish COAG Mental Health Groups in each jurisdiction

O- Substantively met

 

SQ&E

Increased accountability for reform outcomes

Publish official progress reports annually

O- Substantively met

 

Payment

R&SA

Improve service provision in rural/remote areas

Use of flexible funding models to improve access to allied and nursing mental health services in rural and regional areas

O- Substantively met

 

R&SA

Increase health workforce in rural and remote areas, particularly mental health nurses

Indicator 5

Introduce Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program

Introduce flexible employment schemes for rural and regional areas

O- Substantively met

Incentives and flexible employment schemes introduced

 

SS

Improve links between primary and secondary providers

Indicator 5

Introduction of new MBS items to support referral between health practitioners

O- Substantively met

 

Community Education

R&SA

Review mental health content in tertiary health degrees

Review mental health content in tertiary health degrees

O- Substantively met

R- Final project reports identify an increased focus on mental health in both theoretical and clinical subjects

 
  1. Key: Reform Priority Area: Human Rights and Community Attitudes (HR&CA), RCN Responding to Community Need, SS Service Structures, SQ&E Service Quality and Effectiveness and R&SA Resources and Service Access; Evaluation Measure: O Objectives, R Results, I Innovation, TG Target Group Impact; Unequivocal Successes and Failures appear in bold
  2. Bold letters are used to indicate the evaluation measures