Cryopreservation of reproductive material before cancer treatment: a qualitative study of health care professionals’ views about ways to enhance clinical care
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mindy Christianson|
|15 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allan Pacey|
|16 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Karin Hammarberg|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Allan Pacey|
|29 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mindy Christianson|
|29 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Karin Hammarberg|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|10 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2292-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.