Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Crisis checklists for in-hospital emergencies: expert consensus, simulation testing and recommendations for a template determined by a multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary learning collaborative

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Christian Subbe
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dev Mitra
2 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amber Mills
27 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Christian Subbe
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Christian Subbe
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Christian Subbe
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
1 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Christian Subbe
Resubmission - Version 6
1 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
3 May 2017 Editorially accepted
8 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2288-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement