Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 6 Adjusted logistic regression of clients very satisfied with family planning services and client’s correct knowledge of method’s protection from STIs

From: Quality of care in family planning services in Senegal and their outcomes

Variable Category Very satisfied Model Ia Very satisfied Model IIa Correct knowledgeb
OR C.I. OR C.I. OR C.I.
Clients age (ref. = 14–24) 25–39 0.9 0.5–1.6 0.9 0.6–1.6 1.4 0.9–2.2
40–58 & don’t know 1.9 0.8–4.4 1.8 0.7–4.3 1.3 0.7–2.3
Client’s education (ref. = secondary or more) No education 2.1* 1.2–3.9 2.1* 1.2–3.8 0.7 0.4–1.2
Primary & post primary 2.0* 1.0–3.7 2.0* 1.1–3.7 0.9 0.5–1.5
Fee paid for service (ref. = 1000 or more) 0–9 1.3 0.6–3.0 1.4 0.6–3.1   
10–499 0.9 0.4–2.0 1.0 0.4–2.2   
500–999 0.9 0.5–1.6 1.0 0.6–1.8   
Waiting time (ref. = 2 hours or more) No wait 5.4* 1.2–24.0 5.7* 1.3–25.2   
Less than half hour 0.8 0.4–1.4 0.8 0.4–1.4   
Half hour to one hour 1.0 0.5–2.1 1.1 0.5–2.2   
One hour to 2 hours 1.2 0.5–3.0 1.2 0.5–2.8   
Client status (ref. = returning client) New client 1.2 0.6–2.4 1.1 0.6–2.2 0.7 0.5–1.1
Contraceptive method used (ref. = IUD or implants) Pills 1.1 0.5–2.7 1.1 0.5–2.6 1.1 0.6–2.0
Progestin-only injection 1.4 0.7–2.9 1.4 0.6–3.0 0.9 0.5–1.6
Client left with method (ref. = no) Yes 3.9** 1.5–10.4 3.7** 1.4–10.0   
Provider category (ref. = midwife and other) Nurse or nurse assistant 1.0 0.6–1.9 1.1 0.6–1.9 2.1** 1.3–3.2
Provider years of education (ref. = 17+) 6–12 3.6* 1.2–10.3 2.9* 1.0–8.3 1.7 0.8–3.7
13–16 3.8*** 2.2–6.6 3.4*** 1.9–6.1 1.1 0.8–1.7
Provider training in family planning in the past 24 months (ref. = no) Yes 1.5 0.9–2.6 1.5 0.9–2.5 1.7** 1.2–2.5
Provider activities supervised (ref. = none) 1–5 1.0 0.6–2.0 1.2 0.7–2.3 0.7 0.4–1.2
6 0.9 0.5–1.6 0.9 0.5–1.7 1.1 0.7–1.9
Provider has a job description (ref. = no) Yes 1.1 0.6–1.9 1.1 0.6–1.9 1.0 0.6–1.5
Provider salary type (ref. = none) Monthly or daily salary 2.0 0.9–4.5 2.0 0.9–4.6 1.3 0.7–2.5
No regular salary but other compensation 0.9 0.4–1.8 0.9 0.4–1.8 1.3 0.7–2.5
Counseled on how to use method (ref. = no) Yes 1.3 0.8–2.2 1.3 0.8–2.2   
Counseled on side effects of methoda (ref. = yes) No 2.6** 1.5–4.6     
Counseled on when to returna (ref. = yes) No    2.0* 1.2–3.5   
Counseled on whether method protects from STI (ref. = no) Yes      1.2 0.6–2.3
Health facility type (ref. = hospital/health center) Health post 1.5 0.8–2.8 1.4 0.8–2.6 0.7 0.5–1.1
Locality (ref. = urban) Rural 0.9 0.5–1.7 1.0 0.5–1.8 1.3 0.8–2.0
Region (ref. = Northern) Dakar 5.3*** 2.1–12.9 4.8*** 1.9–11.9 3.0** 1.4–6.3
Thiès 2.8* 1.2–6.6 2.5* 1.1–5.9 1.9 1.0–3.7
Central 10.7*** 3.6–32.3 11.5*** 3.7–36.3 1.3 0.6–2.6
East 5.2* 1.4–19.0 4.6* 1.3–16.6 2.0 0.8–4.9
South 12.3*** 3.4–45.4 13.9*** 3.7–52.5 4.2*** 1.9–9.2
General structure equipment composite index (ref. = low) Medium 0.9 0.5–1.7 0.9 0.5–1.5   
High 1.0 0.5–2.0 1.0 0.5–1.9   
Pseudo-R b   0.25   0.25   0.09  
  1. For client satisfaction outcome, Model I includes the variable for counseled on side effects, and
  2. Model II includes the variable on counseled on when to return. aUsers of pill, injectable, IUD, and implant. bAll users
  3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
  4. Note: Bold values indicate a p-value<0.05