Skip to main content

Table 2 Program component assessment (PCA) study sites and informants

From: Using implementation facilitation to foster clinical practice quality and adherence to evidence in challenged settings: a qualitative study

Site

Initial PCA

Informant (s) (n = 12) c

Final PCA

Informant (s) (n = 17) c

Implementation Facilitation (Intervention) Sites

 Network A

  Site A1—VAMC

Internal Regional Facilitator

1 PC-MHI providera

  Site A2—CBOC

1 PC-MHI provider

2 PC-MHI providersa

  Site A3—CBOC

1 PC-MHI provider

1 PC-MHI provider

  Site A4—CBOC

1 PC-MHI provider

1 PC-MHI provider

 Network C

1 centralized PC-MHI provider

  Site C1—VAMC

1 PC-MHI provider

1 PC-MHI providera

  Site C2—CBOC

2 PC-MHI providers

1 PC-MHI providera

  Site C3—CBOC

1 PC-MHI provider

1 PC-MHI providera and 1 Internal Regional Facilitatora

  Site C4—CBOC

No PC-MHI program

1 VAMC PC-MHI Leader

Comparison Sites

 Network B

  Site B1—VAMC

No PC-MHI program

1 PC-MHI provider

  Site B2—CBOC

2 PC-MHI providers

1 PC-MHI provider

  Site B3—CBOC

1 PC-MHI provider

1 PC-MHI provider

  Site B4—CBOC

1 PC-MHI provider

2 PC-MHI providers (1 was differenta)

 Network D

  Site D1—VAMC

b

1 PC-MHI provider/leader

  Site D2—CBOC

No PC-MHI program

No PC-MHI program

  Site D3—CBOC

No PC-MHI program

No PC-MHI program

  Site D4—CBOC

No PC-MHI program

No PC-MHI program

  1. VAMC VA Medical Center, CBOC community-based outpatient clinic
  2. aDifferent informant (s) than initial PCA informants
  3. bNo Program Component Assessment was conducted
  4. cTotal study N = 24 unique participants