Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of data collection methods and sources

From: Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 5: developing a model for evidence-driven resource allocation in a local healthcare setting

Research Question

Method

Source

What are the concepts, definitions and perspectives that underpin disinvestment? [33]

What models or methods of disinvestment have been implemented in hospitals or health services?

Where are the opportunities for systematic decisions about disinvestment in a health service? [9]

Literature review

Health databases, Internet

Survey of external experts

Researchers and health librarians interested in disinvestment (15 respondents)

Semi-structured interviews

Executive of the Technology/Clinical Practice Committee representing Executive Directors, Senior Managers, Clinical Directors (4 members)

Structured interviews

Key informants purposefully selected to represent Medicine, Surgery, Nursing, Allied Health, Diagnostic Services, Consumers (6 informants)

Structured workshops

SHARE Steering Committee: Executive Directors, Senior Managers, Clinical Program Directors, Consumers (20 members)

How are decisions about resource allocation currently made at MH? What factors influence decision-making for resource allocation? [1, 29]

What knowledge or experience of disinvestment exists within Monash Health? [29]

Structured interviews

Representatives of committees with mandate to make organisation-wide decisions (13 committees); Managers of Approved Purchasing Units (5 managers); Program Directors, Medical Department Heads, Nurse Unit Managers and a Quality Manager in a clinical program with high use of TCPs (9 managers)

Structured interviews

Representatives of current or completed projects that involved disinvestment-related activities (10 projects)

Structured workshops

SHARE Steering Committee: Executive Directors, Senior Managers, Clinical Program Directors, Consumers (20 members)

Structured workshop

Decision-makers from a large multi-campus diagnostic service (18 participants)

Document analysis

Victorian Department of Human Services and Monash Health documents

How can consumer values and preferences be integrated into organisation-wide decision-making processes? [30]

Literature review

Health databases, Internet

Semi-structured workshops

Consumer Working Group (3 experienced health service consumer representatives and project team members)

Structured interviews

Staff responsible for consumer-related activities (2 managers)

Structured interviews

Representatives of committees with mandate to make organisation-wide decisions (13 committees); Managers of Approved Purchasing Units (5 managers); Program Directors, Medical Department Heads, Nurse Unit Managers and a Quality Manager in a clinical program with high use of TCPs (9 managers)

What do MH decision-makers need to enable access and utilisation of evidence in decision-making? [31]

Literature review

Health databases, Internet

Structured interviews

Program Directors, Medical Department Heads, Nurse Unit Managers and a Quality Manager in a clinical program with high use of TCPs (9 managers)

Electronic survey

Clinicians and senior managers representing all sites, clinical programs and professional groups (141 respondents, 103 surveys fully completed)