Implementation of evidence-informed practice through central network actors; a case study of three public health units in Canada

Table 2 Regression models to predict EBP behavior scores over time in different groups of respondents based on their information seeking patterns

Regression coefficients		Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Respondents	Seeking information from a peer who is:
Baseline
Not highly engaged	Not highly engaged	9.1(0.7)	9.1(0.7)	10.5(0.5)
	Highly engaged, but not central			−3.2(1.4)*
	Highly engaged central			−0.7(1.1)
Highly engaged, but not central	Not highly engaged	1.6(1.1)	−0.3(1.4)	1.5(2.3)
	Highly engaged, but not central			−4.3(3.0)
	Highly engaged central			−2.1(1.9)
Highly engaged central	Not highly engaged		5.5(1.9)**	5.5(5.2)
	Highly engaged, but not central			2.0(4.8)
	Highly engaged central			4.3(2.1)*
Change from baseline
Not highly engaged	Not highly engaged	0.07(0.4)	0.07(0.4)	−0.8(0.6)
	Highly engaged, but not central			−0.3(1.3)
	Highly engaged central			2.5(1.1)*
Highly engaged, but not central	Not highly engaged	2.4(1.0)*	1.4(1.3)	−0.5(2.3)
	Highly engaged, but not central			−1.8(3.2)
	Highly engaged central			2.9(1.7)
Highly engaged central	Not highly engaged		4.2(1.8)**	−0.3(4.7)
	Highly engaged, but not central			4.8(7.5)
	Highly engaged central			4.9(1.9)**
Random effects variance
Health Units		1.03(1.1)	1.0(1.0)	~0
Individuals		52.5(4.3)	51.7(4.3)	47(4.9)
Residual		36.1(2.7)	36.0(2.7)	33(2.9)

1: The coefficients for all levels at baseline represent the difference from the first row
2: The coefficients for all levels at ‘change from the baseline’ represent the difference from their baseline
*:p < 0.05, **:p < 0.01

ISSN: 1472-6963