Skip to main content

Table 5 Analysis of preliminary list against features of change chronic and complex care

From: Practice change in chronic conditions care: an appraisal of theories

Theorya

Relevant to micro, meso and macro levels

Clearly allows for active involvement by more than one organisation

Patient involvement

Empirical or theoretical bases explicit

Practical measurement tools in key reference?

PRISM Feldstein & Glasgow 2008 [37]

Partly – “macro” barely covered

No

Yes

No - Basis for selecting references not given

Yes

CFIR Damschroder2009 [32]

Partly – “macro” barely covered

No

Somewhat – seeing patients as targets

Yes

Yes Comprehensive discussion and referencing of aspects to be measured

NPT May 2009 [33]a

Partly – “macro” not covered

Consistent but not explicit

Consistent but not explicit

Yes

Partly – Broad outline presented for measurements

General theory of implementation May 2013 [34]

Partly – “macro” not covered

Consistent but not explicit

Consistent but not explicit

Yes

Partly - Measurement conceptually explained

PARIHS Kitson et al. 2008 [26]

Partly – “macro” not covered

Consistent but not explicit

Addressed in evidence – not as active in implementation.

Yes

Yes - Guide for qualitative data collection.

Revised PARIHS framework for USA VHA Stetler 2011 [35]

Partly – “macro” not covered

No

Somewhat – seeing patients as targets

Yes

Yes – Measures explicitly outlined

CRARUM Kontos 2009 [38]

Partly – “macro” not covered

No

No

Yes

No

ARCC Melnyk 2010 [39]

No – micro barely covered, focus of meso is nursing and macro absent

No

No

No

Partly - 2 proposed scales are referenced

Sticky knowledge Elwyn 2007 [36]

Partly – “macro” not covered

Consistent but not explicit

Yes

Partial – describes and references one theory from another discipline

No – Little basis provided for measurement.

  1. aTheories named in bold are those wholly or partly meeting at least 4 of the 5 criteria