Skip to main content

Table 4 Processes of care in Stroke Units

From: The characteristics of stroke units in Ontario: a pan-provincial survey

n (%)

Acute SUs (n = 21)

Integrated SUs (n = 10)

Total (n = 32)a

Available diagnostic procedures

  CT

21 (100.0)

10 (100.0)

31 (96.9)

  MRI

21 (100.0)

9 (90.0)

30 (93.8)

  Cerebral angiography

18 (85.7)

8 (88.0)

26 (83.8)

  Carotid Doppler ultrasound

20 (95.2)

10 (100.0)

30 (93.8)

Available on-site surgical therapy

  Neuro/-vascular surgery

9 (42.9)

3 (33.3)

12 (37.5)

  Interventional neurology

10 (47.6)

3 (33.3)

13 (40.6)

  Interventional neuroradiology

12 (57.1)

4 (44.4)

16 (50.0)

Standardized valid assessments scales

  Barthel index

8 (38.1)

6 (60.0)

14 (43.7)

  Canadian neurological scale

18 (85.7)

7 (70.0)

25 (78.1)

  NIHSS

14 (66.7)

7 (70.0)

21 (65.6)

  FIM

20 (95.2)

10 (100.0)

30 (93.8)

  TORBSST

10 (47.6)

5 (50.0)

15 (46.8)

  Braden scale

20 (95.2)

10 (100.0)

31 (96.8)

Approaches to guide stroke care

  Written protocols

13 (65.0)

8 (80.0)

22 (70.9)

  Standardized order sets

21 (100.0)

10 (100.0)

32 (100.0)

  Monitoring of pressure area

21 (100.0)

10 (100.0)

32 (100.0)

 Interdisciplinary team meeting ≥1/week

20 (95.2)

10 (100.0)

30 (93.8)

 Goal setting

19 (90.5)

9 (90.0)

29 (90.6)

 Creation of individualized care plans

12 (57.1)

10 (100)

23(71.8)

Timing of initial discharge assessment

   < 24 h

7 (33.3)

2 (20.0)

9 (28.3)

  1-2 d

6 (28.6)

5 (50.0)

11 (34.4)

  3-4 d

5 (23.8)

3(30.0)

8 (25.0)

   < 4 d

3 (14.3)

0 (0.0)

3 (12.5)

  1. CT Computed Tomography, FIM Functional Independence Measure, MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging, NIHSS National Institute Health Stroke Scale, TORBSST Toronto Bedside Swallowing Screening Test, SUs Stroke Units
  2. aTotal SUs column includes information on the Rehabilitation unit (n = 1) as well