Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Risk-adjustment methods for all-payer comparative performance reporting in Vermont

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bernhard Schaller
7 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Oliver Reich
13 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Karin Lindahl
11 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Karl Finison
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bernhard Schaller
6 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Karin Lindahl
12 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Karl Finison
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Anne Karin Lindahl
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12913-017-2010-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement