Economic evaluations of health technologies in Dutch healthcare decision-making: a qualitative study of the current and potential use, barriers, and facilitators
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shadi Saleh|
|14 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Whitehurst|
|18 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Kitty Roseboom|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Whitehurst|
|2 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Kitty Roseboom|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-1986-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.