Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Development of an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care using a theory-based method

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Nov 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emily Reeve
7 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Janice Schwartz
10 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tan Maw Pin
23 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Cathal Cadogan
Resubmission - Version 2
23 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emily Reeve
12 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tan Maw Pin
23 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Cathal Cadogan
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Cathal Cadogan
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Nov 2016 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12913-016-1907-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement