Skip to main content

Table 5 Appraisal of the quality of the deliberations and of one’s engagement throughout the process

From: Assessment of a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations on health technology design: participant survey findings and qualitative insights

 

Total

Agree

More or less agree

Disagree

DNA

n

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

Moderator

 The moderator contributed to stimulate the group’s reflections

46

39

86 %

3

6 %

1

2 %

3

6 %

 The moderator respected the opinions of participants

46

43

94 %

0

0 %

0

0 %

3

6 %

Quality of the deliberative processes

 I have had the opportunity to express myself freely

46

46

100 %

0

0 %

0

0 %

0

0 %

 The arguments of the other participants appeared well thought out

46

37

81 %

6

13 %

1

2 %

2

4 %

 Group exchanges have furthered my reflections

46

32

70 %

9

20 %

3

6 %

2

4 %

Personal engagement

 My arguments were well thought out

46

38

83 %

8

17 %

0

0 %

0

0 %

 I was attentive to the views of other participants

46

41

89 %

3

7 %

2

4 %

0

0 %

 I remained interested throughout the experience

43

36

84 %

5

12 %

2

4 %

0

0 %