Skip to main content

Table 5 Appraisal of the quality of the deliberations and of one’s engagement throughout the process

From: Assessment of a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations on health technology design: participant survey findings and qualitative insights

  Total Agree More or less agree Disagree DNA
n n % n % n % n %
Moderator
 The moderator contributed to stimulate the group’s reflections 46 39 86 % 3 6 % 1 2 % 3 6 %
 The moderator respected the opinions of participants 46 43 94 % 0 0 % 0 0 % 3 6 %
Quality of the deliberative processes
 I have had the opportunity to express myself freely 46 46 100 % 0 0 % 0 0 % 0 0 %
 The arguments of the other participants appeared well thought out 46 37 81 % 6 13 % 1 2 % 2 4 %
 Group exchanges have furthered my reflections 46 32 70 % 9 20 % 3 6 % 2 4 %
Personal engagement
 My arguments were well thought out 46 38 83 % 8 17 % 0 0 % 0 0 %
 I was attentive to the views of other participants 46 41 89 % 3 7 % 2 4 % 0 0 %
 I remained interested throughout the experience 43 36 84 % 5 12 % 2 4 % 0 0 %