Skip to main content

Table 5 Odds ratio of predictor variables of Logistic Regression on Minimum Acceptable Diet

From: How is perceived community cohesion and membership in community groups associated with children’s dietary adequacy in disadvantaged communities? A case of the Indian Sundarbans

 

Final model

Odds ratio

CI (95 %)

Community cohesion

1.31

1.14

1.50

Membership in community groups: No membership (Ref)

0.93

0.59

1.46

Perceived household food security Status: Neither deficit nor surplus (Ref)

 Not adequate food throughout the year

1.27

0.81

2.02

 Surplus food throughout the year

2.72

1.32

5.58

Mother’s Education: Illiterate (ref.)

 Up to Primary

2.09

1.03

4.24

 Secondary & above

2.27

0.92

5.60

Mother’s Age: 16–25 years (ref.)

 26–29

1.09

0.60

1.98

 30-Max

0.90

0.45

1.80

Gender: Female (ref.)

 Male

0.81

0.52

1.26

Age (mean) in completed months

1.00

0.99

1.01

Caste General (ref.)

 SC/ST/OBC

0.80

0.40

1.59

Place of Delivery: Home delivery (ref.)

 Institution

0.91

0.61

1.37

Registration with Anganwadi centre Children not registered (ref.)

 Anganwadi centre

1.34

0.69

2.60

  Prob > chi2

  

0.0001

  Pseudo R2

  

0.0559

  Log likelihood

  

−269.88