Skip to main content

Table 5 Odds ratio of predictor variables of Logistic Regression on Minimum Acceptable Diet

From: How is perceived community cohesion and membership in community groups associated with children’s dietary adequacy in disadvantaged communities? A case of the Indian Sundarbans

  Final model
Odds ratio CI (95 %)
Community cohesion 1.31 1.14 1.50
Membership in community groups: No membership (Ref) 0.93 0.59 1.46
Perceived household food security Status: Neither deficit nor surplus (Ref)
 Not adequate food throughout the year 1.27 0.81 2.02
 Surplus food throughout the year 2.72 1.32 5.58
Mother’s Education: Illiterate (ref.)
 Up to Primary 2.09 1.03 4.24
 Secondary & above 2.27 0.92 5.60
Mother’s Age: 16–25 years (ref.)
 26–29 1.09 0.60 1.98
 30-Max 0.90 0.45 1.80
Gender: Female (ref.)
 Male 0.81 0.52 1.26
Age (mean) in completed months 1.00 0.99 1.01
Caste General (ref.)
 SC/ST/OBC 0.80 0.40 1.59
Place of Delivery: Home delivery (ref.)
 Institution 0.91 0.61 1.37
Registration with Anganwadi centre Children not registered (ref.)
 Anganwadi centre 1.34 0.69 2.60
  Prob > chi2    0.0001
  Pseudo R2    0.0559
  Log likelihood    −269.88