Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of included qualitative articles

From: The effectiveness of clinical networks in improving quality of care and patient outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

Authors

Country

Type of network

Theme

Study design

Quality ratinga

Addicott 2008 [41]

UK

Managed clinical network for cancer services

Organisational structure

Comparative case study

High

Addicott & Ferlie 2007 [42]

UK

Managed clinical network for cancer services

Organisational structure

Comparative case study

High

Addicott et al. 2007 [43]

UK

Managed clinical network for cancer services

Organisational structure

Comparative case study

High

Addicott et al. 2006 [44]

UK

Managed clinical network for cancer services

Organisational learning and knowledge

Observational, cross-sectional organisational process study

High

Ahgren & Axelsson 2007 [35]

Sweden

‘Chains of care’ (managed clinical networks) for patients having the same illness or symptom

Features and outcomes of effective networks

Cross-sectional embedded multiple-case study

High

Baker & Wright 2006 [36]

UK

Managed clinical network for paediatric liver services

Features and outcomes of effective networks

Appreciative Inquiry methodology (case study)

Moderate

Burnett et al. 2005 [45]

UK

Various managed clinical networks (cancer, coronary heart disease, stroke, mental health)

Organisational learning and knowledge

Qualitative information and knowledge needs analysis (comparative case study)

Moderate

Cunningham et al. 2012 [23]

Australia

Advisory clinical networks – two networks for musculoskeletal health (NSW and WA)

Features and outcomes of effective networks

Longitudinal comparative case study

High

Fleury et al. 2002 [40]

Canada

Mental health integrated service network

Network implementation

Case study and multi-dimensional analytic model

Moderate

Hogard & Ellis 2010 [38]

UK

Managed clinical network for personality disorder

Features and outcomes of effective networks

Evaluation Trident methodology (case study)

Moderate

McInnes et al. 2012 [39]

Australia

Voluntary collegial clinical networks in NSW established by the NSW Agency for Clinical Innovation

Features and outcomes of effective networks

Comparative case study

High

Tolson et al. 2007 [5]

Scotland

Managed clinical network (Palliative Care), linking primary, secondary and tertiary care

Network implementation

Realistic Evaluation methodology (qualitative pilot case study)

High

Touati et al. 2006 [13]

Canada

Managed clinical network (cancer)

Network implementation

Longitudinal qualitative case study

High

  1. aQuality rating definitions are as follows
  2. • High quality – those meeting 8 or more criteria
  3. • Medium quality – those meeting between 5 and 7 criteria
  4. • Low quality – those meeting fewer than five criteria
  5. The full list of 11 criteria can be found in Additional file 1