Skip to main content

Table 3 Efficacy parameters at Week 52 and Week 104 in the mITT analysis set [21, 22]

From: A post-hoc analysis of the comparative efficacy of canagliflozin and glimepiride in the attainment of type 2 diabetes-related quality measures

  

CANA 100 mg (N = 483)

CANA 300 mg (N = 485)

GLIM (N = 482)

LS mean change (SE)

LS mean change (SE)

LS mean change (SE)

A1C, %

52 weeks

−0.82 (0.04)

−0.93 (0.04)

−0.81 (0.04)

 

104 weeks

−0.65 (0.04)

−0.74 (0.04)

−0.55 (0.04)

SBP, mm Hg

52 weeks

−3.3 (0.6)

−4.6 (0.6)

0.2 (0.6)

 

104 weeks

−2.0 (0.6)

−3.1 (0.6)

1.7 (0.6)

DBP, mm Hg

52 weeks

−1.8 (0.4)

−2.5 (0.4)

−0.1 (0.4)

 

104 weeks

−1.3 (0.4)

−2.2 (0.4)

−0.0 (0.4)

BW, kg

52 weeks

−3.7 (0.2)

−4.0 (0.2)

0.7 (0.2)

 

104 weeks

−3.6 (0.2)

−3.6 (0.2)

0.8 (0.2)

  1. A1C glycated hemoglobin, BW body weight, CANA canagliflozin, DBP diastolic blood pressure, GLIM glimepiride, LS least squares, mITT modified intent-to-treat, SBP systolic blood pressure, SE standard error