Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 2 Use of rehabilitation services. OLS (models A and B) and IV (model C) regressions with municipality fixed effects. N = 1636.a

From: The effects of the Norwegian Coordination Reform on the use of rehabilitation services: panel data analyses of service use, 2010 to 2013

  Use of specialist level (hospital) rehabilitation services (log) Use of rehabilitation services in private institutions (log) Use of municipal rehabilitation services (log)
  (A) (B) (C) (A) (B) (C) (A) (B) (C)
Year 2011 (=1) −0.03 −0.03 −0.02 −0.07 −0.06 −0.04 0.07 *** 0.05 ** 0.00
(0.02) (0.02) (0.03) (0.05) (0.05) (0.04) (0.03) (0.02) (0.03)
Year 2012 (=1) −0.15 *** −0.15 *** −0.11 ** 0.25 *** 0.27 *** 0.32 *** 0.12 *** 0.06 * −0.05
(0.02) (0.03) (0.06) (0.05) (0.06) (0.09) (0.03) (0.03) (0.08)
Year 2013 (=1) −0.22 *** −0.21 *** −0.15 0.34 *** 0.36 *** 0.47 *** 0.18 *** 0.07 −0.13
(0.02) (0.05) (0.10) (0.06) (0.07) (0.16) (0.03) (0.05) (0.15)
Share of pop. 67–79 (log)   0.04 −0.96   −0.52 −2.97 *   1.40 ** 3.81 **
  (0.48) (1.11)   (0.63) (1.74)   (0.63) (1.71)
Share of pop.80+ (log)   0.36 0.96   −0.86 −4.60 ***   0.21 1.29
  (0.29) (1.01)   (0.80) (1.69)   (0.45) (1.58)
Deaths per inhab. (log)   0.02 −0.70   −0.02 0.85   0.05 −1.55
  (0.07) (1.04)   (0.10) (1.44)   (0.09) (1.39)
Reported crimes per inhab. (log)   0.04 −0.02   0.13 0.05   −0.16 −0.10
  (0.10) (0.11)   (0.14) (0.14)   (0.12) (0.12)
R2 0.78 0.78 0.76 0.84 0.84 0.82 0.84 0.84 0.79
  1. a Results weighted by municipal population. All regressions include municipality indicators (parameter estimates not shown). Reference year is 2010 (Y2010 = 1). Robust standard errors in parentheses
  2. * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.01