This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Differences in nulliparous caesarean section rates across models of care: a decomposition analysis
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 18 December 2015
Accepted: 29 June 2016
Published: 8 July 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ilias-Ioannis Kyriopoulos|
|25 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Li-Yin Chien|
|24 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Aoife Brick|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Aoife Brick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jun 2016||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jul 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12913-016-1494-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.