Skip to main content

Table 4 Factors associated with LOSa

From: Impact of a well-developed primary care system on the length of stay in emergency departments in the Netherlands: a multicenter study

 

Before including fixed effectsb

After including fixed effectsb

 

Difference in LOSc

95 % Confidence Interval

P value

Difference in LOSc

95 % Confidence interval

P value

Lower bound

Upper bound

Lowerbound

Upper bound

Time of presentation

Weekdayc

Reference

   

Reference

   

Evening

−21.1

−26.4

−15.8

0.000

−13.1

18.1

−8.2

0.000

Night

−25.2

−32.2

−18.1

0.000

−20.4

−27.0

−13.9

0.000

Weekend day

−15.8

−22.5

−9.1

0.000

−11.0

−17.2

−4.7

0.001

Origin

Self referredc

Reference

   

Reference

   

Referred by medical professionals

57.3

52.0

62.5

0.000

32.9

27.7

38.2

0.000

Referred via radiology

−14.9

−27.6

−2.2

0.022

−6.5

−18.7

5.6

0.293

Follow up

Hospital Admissionc

Reference

   

Reference

   

Out patient Clinic

−63.8

−69.1

−58.6

0.000

−41.2

−46.6

−35.8

0.000

PCP Follow-up

−72.2

−80.7

−63.7

0.000

−49.9

−58.3

−41.5

0.000

No Follow-up

−71.3

−77.7

−65.2

0.000

−44.6

−51.0

−38.3

0.000

  1. Legend. aResults from random coefficient regression modeling, all analysis included hospitals as random effect, bfixed effects are age, sex and trauma, cdifference in LOS compared to the reference category