Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Transitioning from cytology-based screening to HPV-based screening at longer intervals: implications for resource use

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miriam Elfström
30 Nov 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marek Cybulski
8 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maarit Leinonen
8 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Megan Smith
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marek Cybulski
25 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maarit Leinonen
26 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miriam Elfström
29 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Megan Smith
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marek Cybulski
7 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maarit Leinonen
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
5 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
26 Apr 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12913-016-1375-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement