Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of three outcome measures between the intervention (RBWH) and control group (LH) and between the pre- and post-test period

From: Hospital in the Nursing Home program reduces emergency department presentations and hospital admissions from residential aged care facilities in Queensland, Australia: a quasi-experimental study

ED presentation rate (Number of ED presentations per 1000 RACF beds):

 

3-month pre-test (Mean ± SD)

3-month post-test (Mean ± SD)

1-year post-test (Mean ± SD)

Rate Ratio (95 % CI)

p-value

06/2005–08/2005

06/2011–08/2011

03/2011–02/2012

3-month post-test vs. 3-month pre-test

Intervention group

70.37 ± 6.59

52.72 ± 1.45

45.07 ± 5.84

0.75 (0.65, 0.86)

<0.0001**

Control group

74.92 ± 12.52

67.28 ± 3.83

69.69 ± 7.92

0.90 (0.75, 1.08)

0.246

Rate Ratio (95 % CI) Intervention vs. Control

0.94 (0.80, 1.11)

0.78 (0.67, 0.92)

0.65 (0.60, 0.70)

  

p-value

0.455

0.002**

<0.0001**

  

Hospital admission rate per RACF bed (Number of hospital admissions per 1000 RACF beds):

 

3-month pre-test (Mean ± SD)

3-month post-test (Mean ± SD)

1-year post-test (Mean ± SD)

Rate Ratio (95 % CI)

p-value

06/2005–08/2005

06/2011–08/2011

03/2011–02/2012

3-month post-test vs. 3-month pre-test

Intervention group

40.12 ± 8.74

26.29 ± 0.84

23.98 ± 3.37

0.66 (0.54, 0.79)

<0.0001**

Control group

34.38 ± 5.13

42.65 ± 6.23

46.33 ± 6.20

1.24 (0.96, 1.60)

0.093

Rate Ratio (95 % CI) Intervention vs. Control

1.17 (0.92, 1.48)

0.62 (0.50, 0.76)

0.52 (0.47, 0.57)

  

p-value

0.199

<0.0001**

<0.0001**

  

Hospital admission rate per ED presentation (Number of hospital admissions per 100 ED presentations):

 

3-month pre-test (Mean ± SD)

3-month post-test (Mean ± SD)

1-year post-test (Mean ± SD)

Odds Ratioa (95 % CI)

p-value

06/2005–08/2005

06/2011–08/2011

03/2011–02/2012

3-month post-test vs. 3-month pre-test

Intervention group

56.63 ± 8.46

49.91 ± 2.58

53.34 ± 5.16

0.82 (0.61, 1.11)

0.196

Control group

46.18 ± 4.58

63.20 ± 5.85

66.60 ± 6.34

2.10 (1.36, 3.26)

0.001**

Odds Ratioa (95 % CI) Intervention vs. Control

1.29 (0.87, 1.93)

0.61 (0.43, 0.85)

0.59 (0.49, 0.70)

  

p-value

0.209

0.004**

<0.0001**

  
  1. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval
  2. a Odds ratio was obtained using binary logistic regression that modelled impact of the HiNH intervention and impact of the test period, respectively, on the outcome, after controlling for patients’ age, gender, Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), primary clinical diagnosis, season, day (weekday/weekend) and time (working hours/after hours) of patients’ ED departure