Table 2 Overview of reporting excellence according to the SQUIRE guidelines
From: The impact of redesigning care processes on quality of care: a systematic review
Reference | Introduction | Methods | Results | Conclusion & discussion | Total # SQUIRE components mentioned | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention | Methods of evaluation | Analysis | Setting | Changes in process | ||||
1. Pennell, et al. (2005) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 3/10 components (indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; study design for measuring its impact; explains how method was applied) | Describes 2/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation, primary and secondary outcomes) | Describes 1/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods) | Describes 2/4 components (documents degree of success in implementation; describes how and why the initial plan evolved) | Describes 4/5 components (presents data on changes observed in the care delivery process; presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 3/5 components (summary, interpretations, conclusions) | 19/38 |
2. King, Ben-Tovim, Bassham (2006) | Describes 3/5 components (local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 4/10 components (setting, intervention and components /parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention, implementation plan) | Describes 1/5 components (primary and secondary outcomes) | Describes 2/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods; aligns unit of analysis with the intervention) | Describes 3/4 components (relevant elements of setting or settings; explains the actual course of the intervention; describes how and why the initial plan evolved) | Describes 3/5 components (presents data on changes observed in the care delivery process; presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; presents evidence on strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 3/5 components (summary; limitations; conclusions) | 19/38 |
3. Raab, Andrew-JaJa, Condel, et al.(2006) | Describes 3/5 components (background knowledge; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 5/10 components (setting; intervention and components/ parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; study design for measuring impact intervention; explains how method was applied) | Describes 1/5 components (methods used to assure data quality and adequacy) | Describes 3/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods; specifies degree of expected variability; describes analytic method used to demonstrate effects of time) | Describes 2/4 components (explains the actual course of the intervention; documents degree of success in implementation) | Describes 2/5 components (considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 3/5 components (relation to other evidence, limitations, interpretations) | 19/38 |
4. Raab, et al. (2006) | Describes 3/5 components (background knowledge; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 6/10 components (setting; intervention and components/ parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; expected change mechanisms; study design for measuring impact intervention; explains how method was applied) | Describes 0/5 components | Describes 1/4 components (describes analytic method used to demonstrate effects of time) | Describes 0/4 components | Describes 1/5 components (presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 4/5 components (relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 15/38 |
5. Shannon, et al. (2006) | Describes 3/5 components (background knowledge; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 4/10 components (ethical issues; setting; intervention and components/ parts; Implementation plan) | Describes 1/5 components (primary and secondary outcomes) | Describes 2/4 components (aligns unit of analysis with the intervention; describes analytic method used to demonstrate effects of time) | Describes 2/4 components (explains the actual course of the intervention; documents degree of success in implementation) | Describes 4/5 components (presents data on changes observed in the care delivery process; presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 4/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations) | 20/38 |
6. Kelly, Bryant, Cox et al. (2007) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 5/10 components (setting; intervention and components/parts; implementation plan; study design for measuring impact intervention; explains how method was applied) | Describes 3/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation; contribution of components of intervention to effectiveness; primary and secondary outcomes) | Describes 1/4 components (aligns unit of analysis with the intervention) | Describes 2/4 components (explains the actual course of the intervention; documents degree of success in implementation) | Describes 2/5 components (presents data on changes observed in care delivery process; includes summary of missing data) | Describes 5/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 22/38 |
7. Kim, et al. (2007) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 5/10 components (ethical issues; setting; intervention and components/ parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; study design for measuring impact intervention; explains how method was applied; internal and external validity) | Describes 2/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation; contribution of components of intervention to effectiveness) | Describes 1/4 components (aligns unit of analysis with the intervention) | Describes 2/4 components (explains the actual course of the intervention; documents degree of success in implementation) | Describes 2/5 components (presents data on changes observed in care delivery process; includes summary of missing data) | Describes 4/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations) | 20/38 |
8. Raab, Grzybicki, Condel, et al. (2007) | Describes 3/5 components (background knowledge; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 6/10 components (setting; intervention and components/parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; implementation plan; study design for measuring impact intervention; explains how method was applied) | Describes 1/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation) | Describes 1/4 components (describes analytic method used to demonstrate effects of time) | Describes 1/4 components (documents degree of success in implementation) | Describes 2/5 components (presents data on changes observed in care delivery process; considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures) | Describes 3/5 components (summary; limitations; interpretations) | 17/38 |
9. Shendell-Falik, Feinson, Mohr (2007) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge,; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 4/10 components (setting; intervention; components/parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; expected change mechanisms) | Describes 3/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation; contribution of components of intervention to effectiveness; primary and secondary outcomes) | Describes 0/4 components | Describes 4/4 components (relevant elements of setting or settings; explains the actual course of the intervention; documents degree of success in implementation; describes how and why the initial plan evolved) | Describes 3/5 components (presents data on changes observed in the care delivery process; presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 2/5 components (summary; conclusions) | 20/38 |
10. Wood, Brennan, Chaudhry, et al. (2008) | Describes 3/5 components (background knowledge; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 2/10 components (setting; intervention and components/parts) | Describes 1/5 components (primary and secondary outcomes) | Describes 0/4 components | Describes 1/4 components (actual course of the intervention) | Describes 1/5 components (evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 3/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; conclusions) | 11/38 |
11. Reid, et al. (2009) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 7/10 components (ethical issues; setting; intervention and components/parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; study design for measuring impact of intervention; explains how method was applied; internal and external validity) | Describes 3/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation; primary and secondary outcomes; methods used to assure data quality and adequacy) | Describes 3/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods; aligns unit of analysis with the intervention; describes analytic method used to demonstrate effects of time) | Describes 0/4 components | Describes 3/5 components (presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes; includes summary of missing data) | Describes 5/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 25/38 |
12. Auerbach, et al. (2010) | Describes 3/5 components (background knowledge; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 8/10 components (setting; intervention and components/parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; implementation plan; plan for assessment of implementation; study design for measuring impact of intervention; explains how method was applied; internal and external validity) | Describes 2/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation; primary and secondary outcomes) | Describes 3/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods; aligns unit of analysis with the intervention; describes analytic method used to demonstrate effects of time) | Describes 2/4 components (relevant elements of setting or settings; documents degree of success in implementation) | Describes 5/5 components (presents data on changes observed in the care delivery process; presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes; includes summary of missing data) | Describes 4/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations) | 27/38 |
13. Ravikumar, et al. (2010) | Describes 3/5 components (background knowledge; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 7/10 components (setting; intervention and components/parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; implementation plan; study design for measuring impact of intervention; explains how method was applied; internal and external validity) | Describes 1/5 components (primary and secondary outcomes) | Describes 3/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods; aligns unit of analysis with the intervention; describes analytic method used to demonstrate effects of time) | Describes 4/4 components (relevant elements of setting or settings; explains the actual course of the intervention; documents degree of success in implementation; describes how and why the initial plan evolved) | Describes 3/5 components (presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 4/5 components (relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 25/38 |
14. Hwang, Lee, Shin (2011) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 4/10 components, (setting; intervention and components parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; study design for measuring intervention) | Describes 2/5 components (primary and secondary outcomes; methods used to assure data quality and adequacy) | Describes 0/4 components | Describes 0/4 components | Describes 3/5 components (data on changes observed in the care delivery process; data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures) | Describes 5/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 18/38 |
15. Collar, et al. (2012) | Describes 1/5 components (intended aim) | Describes 6/10 components (intervention and components/parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; implementation plan; study design for measuring impact of intervention; explains how method was applied; internal and external validity) | Describes 2/5 components (primary and secondary outcomes; reports validity and reliability of instruments) | Describes 2/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods; aligns unit of analysis with the intervention) | Describes 0/5 components | Describes 4/5 components (presents data on changes observed in the care delivery process; presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 4/5 components (relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 19/38 |
16. Krening, Rehling-Anthony, Garko (2012) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 5/10 components (setting; intervention and components/parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; implementation plan; expected change mechanisms) | Describes 3/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation; primary and secondary outcomes; explains methods used to assure data quality and adequacy) | Describes 0/4 components | Describes 4/4 components (relevant elements of setting or settings; explains the actual course of the intervention; documents degree of success in implementation; describes how and why the initial plan evolved) | Describes 4/5 components (presents data on changes observed in the care delivery process; presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; considers benefits, harms, unexpected results, problems, failures; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 4/5 components summary; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 20/38 |
17. Murray, Christen, Marsh, et al.(2012) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 6/10 components (setting; intervention and components/parts; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; implementation plan; expected change mechanisms; internal and external validity) | Describes 3/5 components (instruments to measure effectiveness of implementation; primary and secondary outcomes; methods used to assure data quality and adequacy) | Describes 2/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods; aligns unit of analysis with the intervention) | Describes 2/4 components (relevant elements of setting or settings; describes how and why the initial plan evolved) | Describes 4/5 components (presents data on changes observed in the care delivery process; presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes; includes summary of missing data) | Describes 5/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 23/38 |
18. Liss, et al. (2013) | Describes 4/5 components (background knowledge; local problem; intended aim; and who, what and why of intervention) | Describes 4/10 components, (setting; indicated main factors contributing to choice of intervention; study design for measuring intervention; internal and external validity) | Describes 3/5 components (primary and secondary outcomes; validity and reliability of instruments; explains methods used to assure data quality and adequacy) | Describes 1/4 components (details of qualitative and quantitative methods) | Describes 1/4 components (characterizes relevant elements of setting or settings) | Describes 2/5 components (presents data on changes observed in measures of patient outcome; presents evidence regarding strength of association between intervention and changes) | Describes 5/5 components (summary; relation to other evidence; limitations; interpretations; conclusions) | 20/38 |