Study | Year | Country | # Analyses | Horizon (months) | Model | Fundingb | Subgroups | Comparison | Price per stent (2012 €) | Price difference DES vs BMS (2012 €) | # Stents per procedure | Quality (%)a |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ekman et al. [15] | 2004 | Sweden | 66 | 12,24 | DT | Yes | High risk, diabetes, type of lesion, type of vessel | BMS vs | NS | 1.1-1.8 | 41 | |
PES | NS | 693-1271 | ||||||||||
Hill et al. [22] | 2004 | UK | 36 | 12-60 | STM | No | High risk, # vessels | BMS vs | 679 | 1.3,2.4 | 77 | |
DES | 1607 | 929 | ||||||||||
Tarricone et al. [19] | 2004 | Italy | 10 | 12 | DT | Yes | # vessels, diabetes, type of lesion, type of vessel | BMS vs | NS | 1.2 – 2.6 | 46 | |
SES | NS | 0 | ||||||||||
Bowen et al. [21] | 2005 | Canada | 50 | 12 | DT | No | Post MI, diabetes, type of lesion | BMS vs | 531 | 1.23–2.26 | 61 | |
DES | 1681 | 1150 | ||||||||||
Mittmann et al. [13] | 2005 | Canada | 8 | 12 | DT | NS | BMS vs | 522 | 1.5 | 50 | ||
SES | 2062 | 1540 | ||||||||||
PES | 2062 | 1540 | ||||||||||
Shrive et al. [17] | 2005 | Canada | 11 | LT | STM | Yes | Diabetes, age | BMS vs | 430 | 1.05–1.75 | 56 | |
SES | 1246-3114 | 816-2685 | ||||||||||
Mahieu et al. [12] | 2006 | Belgium | 31 | 12 | DT | NS | Diabetes, type of lesion, type of vessel | BMS vs | NS | 1 | 32 | |
SES | NS | 731-1306 | ||||||||||
PES | NS | 731-1306 | ||||||||||
Hill et al. [2] | 2007 | UK | 172 | 12 | STM | No | High risk, elective | BMS vs | 485 | 1-2 | 80 | |
SES | 1700-1774 | 1215-1289 | ||||||||||
PES | 1621-1696 | 1136-1211 | ||||||||||
Kuukasjarvi et al. [23] | 2007 | Finland | 2 | 24 | DT | No | BMS vs | NS | NS | 33 | ||
DES | NS | NS | ||||||||||
Neyt et al. [8] | 2007 | Belgium | 59 | 12 | DT | NS | Diabetes, # vessels, type of lesion | BMS vs | 553-1106 | 1.09–1.97 | 72 | |
DES | 553-1659 | 0-1106 | ||||||||||
Polanczyk et al. [18] | 2007 | Brazil | 4 | 12, LT | STM | Yes | BMS vs | 831-1390 | 1.2 | 56 | ||
SES | 3169 | 1779, 2337 | ||||||||||
Bischof et al. [14] | 2009 | USA | 4 | 36 | STM | No | BMS vs | NS | NS | NS | 76 | |
SES | NS | |||||||||||
PES | NS | |||||||||||
Goeree et al.[24] | 2009 | Canada | 45 | 24 | DT | No | Diabetes, type of lesion, type of vessel | BMS vs | 470 | 1.1–2.37 | 52 | |
DES | 1486 | 391-1016 | ||||||||||
Ferreira et al. [16] | 2010 | Brazil | 1 | 26 | DT | No | BMS vs | 1883 | NS | 36 | ||
PES | 5272 | 3390 | ||||||||||
2010 | Austria | 6 | 84 | DES | No | Diabetes, type of lesion | BMS vs | NS | 1.24 | 47 | ||
DES | NS | NS | ||||||||||
Remak et al. [20] | 2010 | UK | 3 | 48 | STM | Yes | BMS vs | 433 | 1.11 | 62 | ||
ZES | 1175 | 742 | 1.12-1.4 |