Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of the included studies using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)

From: What are the similarities and differences in structure and function among the three main models of community health centers in China: a systematic review

Author(s), Year Qualitative Quantitative descriptive Mixed methods Total Points Score Quality
  Sources of data relevant to objectives Analysis process relevant to objectives Consideration of findings relate to context Consideration of findings relate to researchers’ influence Sampling strategy relevant to objectives Sample representativeness Measurements appropriate Acceptable response rate Mixed methods research design relevant to objectives Integration of results relevant to objectives Consideration of limitations associated with this integration    
Zhao et al. (2010) [26] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 8/11 0.73 Moderate-Strong
Wang (2008) [13] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 8/11 0.73 Moderate-Strong
Guo (2010) [21] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 8/11 0.73 Moderate-Strong
Zhang (2008) [23] 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 7/11 0.64 Moderate-Weak
Li (2009) [30] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 8/11 0.73 Moderate-Strong
Fan et al. (2007) [18] N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 4/4 1.00 Strong
Yao et al. (2010) [27] 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 8/11 0.73 Moderate-Strong
Li et al. (2010) [25] N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 4/4 1.00 Strong
Yang & Dai (2010) [22] N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 4/4 1.00 Strong
Chen & Du (2010) [24] N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 0 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 3/4 0.75 Moderate-Strong
Wang et al. (2009) [28] N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 4/4 1.00 Strong
Xu et al. (2011) [19] N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 1 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 4/4 1.00 Strong
Chen et al. (2009) [29] N/A N/A N/A N/A 1 0 1 1 N/A N/A N/A 3/4 0.75 Moderate-Strong