Skip to main content

Table 3 Quality assessment of the included studies using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)

From: What are the similarities and differences in structure and function among the three main models of community health centers in China: a systematic review

Author(s), Year

Qualitative

Quantitative descriptive

Mixed methods

Total Points

Score

Quality

 

Sources of data relevant to objectives

Analysis process relevant to objectives

Consideration of findings relate to context

Consideration of findings relate to researchers’ influence

Sampling strategy relevant to objectives

Sample representativeness

Measurements appropriate

Acceptable response rate

Mixed methods research design relevant to objectives

Integration of results relevant to objectives

Consideration of limitations associated with this integration

   

Zhao et al. (2010) [26]

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

8/11

0.73

Moderate-Strong

Wang (2008) [13]

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

8/11

0.73

Moderate-Strong

Guo (2010) [21]

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

8/11

0.73

Moderate-Strong

Zhang (2008) [23]

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

7/11

0.64

Moderate-Weak

Li (2009) [30]

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

8/11

0.73

Moderate-Strong

Fan et al. (2007) [18]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

1

1

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

4/4

1.00

Strong

Yao et al. (2010) [27]

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

8/11

0.73

Moderate-Strong

Li et al. (2010) [25]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

1

1

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

4/4

1.00

Strong

Yang & Dai (2010) [22]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

1

1

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

4/4

1.00

Strong

Chen & Du (2010) [24]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

0

1

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

3/4

0.75

Moderate-Strong

Wang et al. (2009) [28]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

1

1

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

4/4

1.00

Strong

Xu et al. (2011) [19]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

1

1

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

4/4

1.00

Strong

Chen et al. (2009) [29]

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1

0

1

1

N/A

N/A

N/A

3/4

0.75

Moderate-Strong