Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics of the subgroups and tests of differences between groups

From: Collaboration processes and perceived effectiveness of integrated care projects in primary care: a longitudinal mixed-methods study

 

Total

Subgroup 1 United Integration Perspectives (UIP)

Subgroup 2 Disunited Integration Perspectives (DIP)

Subgroup 3 Professional-oriented Integration Perspectives (PIP)

Subgroup differences

n (%)

42

16 (38.1)

9 (21.4)

17 (40.5)

F-tests

Degree of integration - mean (SD)

    

Multivariate F (6, 76) = 25.95***

 System integration

2.69 (0.38)

3.00 (0.00)a

2.89 (0.22)a

2.29 (0.25)b

F (2, 39) = 26.67***

 Organisational integration

3.29 (0.34)

3.52 (0.17)a

2.87 (0.22)b

3.30 (0.29)c

F (2, 39) = 21.58***

 Professional integration

3.52 (0.28)

3.61 (0.19)a

3.23 (0.26)b

3.60 (0.28)a

F (2, 39) = 9.18**

Change in collaboration process - mean (SD)

    

Multivariate F (10, 72) = 1.57

 Shared ambition

0.01 (0.10)

0.02 (0.06)

−0.03 (0.10)

0.02 (0.10)

F(2, 39) = 0.96

 Mutual gains

−0.00 (0.12)

0.04 (0.09)a

−0.10 (0.11)b

0.01 (0.12)

F(2, 39) = 4.44*

 Relationship dynamics

0.03 (0.10)

0.05 (0.07)a

−0.05 (0.12)b

0.04 (0.10)

F(2, 39) = 3.82*

 Organisation dynamics

0.03 (0.12)

0.06 (0.09)a

−0.08 (0.12)b

0.05 (0.11)a

F(2, 39) = 5.42**

 Process management

0.03 (0.12)

0.04 (0.09)

−0.07 (0.14)a

0.08 (0.10)b

F(2, 39) = 5.68**

Perceived effectiveness - mean (SD)

    

Multivariate F (6, 70) = 4.93***

 System level

3.76 (0.66)

4.07 (0.46)a

3.22 (0.97)b

3.76 (0.44)

F(2, 38) = 5.63**

 Organisational level

7.20 (0.84)

7.72 (0.37)a

6.2 (0.93)b

7.23 (0.66)a

F(2, 39) = 16.43***

 Professional level

4.01 (0.33)

4.02 (0.28)

3.71 (0.18)a

4.15 (0.36)b

F(2, 36) = 5.70**

  1. * = p < .05; ** = p < .01; *** = p < .001. Means that do not share the same subscript (a, b or c) differ in the Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc comparisons (p < .05)