Skip to main content

Table 3 Final models of relationship between neighborhood factors on knowledge and self care behaviors

From: Assessing the relationship between neighborhood factors and diabetes related health outcomes and self-care behaviors

Ā 

Diabetes knowledge

Medication adherence

General diet

Exercise

Blood sugar testing

Foot care

Neighborhood problems

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒSafety

āˆ’0.016

0.019

0.0002

āˆ’0.097

0.002

0.007

ā€ƒViolence

0.001

āˆ’0.089

āˆ’0.036

0.007

āˆ’0.092

0.015

ā€ƒCrime

āˆ’0.341

0.220

0.119

0.114

0.209

0.156

ā€ƒProblems

āˆ’0.017

āˆ’0.012

0.004

āˆ’0.026

āˆ’0.001

0.074

Neighborhood characteristics

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒAesthetics

0.141*

0.042

āˆ’0.093*

āˆ’0.005

āˆ’0.053

āˆ’0.084

ā€ƒWalking environments

0.010

āˆ’0.019

0.014

āˆ’0.040*

0.034

0.036

ā€ƒRecreational facilities

0.061

0.040

0.025

āˆ’0.054

āˆ’0.001

āˆ’0.020

ā€ƒNeighborhood activities

0.007

āˆ’0.018

āˆ’0.072*

āˆ’0.104*

āˆ’0.057

āˆ’0.114*

ā€ƒNeighborhood rating

āˆ’0.137

0.017

āˆ’0.052

0.058

āˆ’0.107

0.064

ā€ƒNeighborhood comparison

0.452*

āˆ’0.224

āˆ’0.082

āˆ’0.153

āˆ’0.086

0.024

Access to healthy food

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒFood insecurity

āˆ’0.108

āˆ’0.147*

āˆ’0.125*

āˆ’0.106

āˆ’0.172*

āˆ’0.046

ā€ƒAccess to healthy food

āˆ’0.036

āˆ’0.025

āˆ’0.019

0.018

āˆ’0.007

āˆ’0.016

Social support

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒSocial cohesion

0.090

0.046*

0.028

0.026

āˆ’0.019

0.070

ā€ƒSocial support

0.001

0.009*

0.016**

0.006

0.009

0.010*

Comorbidities

0.040

āˆ’0.132*

0.048

āˆ’0.064

0.191**

0.173**

Health literacy

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒLow (ref)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒMarginal

0.025

0.714

0.539

0.338

0.158

0.524

ā€ƒAdequate

2.12**

0.494

0.412

0.258

0.350

0.475

Age

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒ18ā€“34 years

āˆ’0.384

āˆ’0.801

āˆ’0.987

āˆ’0.501

āˆ’0.191

1.58

ā€ƒ35ā€“44 years

āˆ’0.187

āˆ’0.230

0.120

0.281

0.287

āˆ’0.437

ā€ƒ45ā€“64 (ref)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒ65+ years

āˆ’0.614

0.507*

0.529*

0.182

0.156

0.215

Gender

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒMale (ref)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒFemale

0.277

0.103

āˆ’0.216

āˆ’0.265

āˆ’0.269

0.015

Marital status

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒNever married (ref)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒMarried

0.312

0.514

āˆ’0.156

āˆ’0.356

āˆ’0.328

0.463

ā€ƒSeparated/divorced

āˆ’0.195

0.419

0.218

āˆ’0.174

āˆ’0.576

0.221

ā€ƒWidowed

āˆ’0.152

0.208

āˆ’0.055

āˆ’0.546

āˆ’0.526

0.816

Race

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒNon-Hispanic White (ref)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒNon-Hispanic Black

āˆ’0.509

āˆ’0.335

0.065

āˆ’0.087

0.223

0.516*

ā€ƒHispanic/other

0.598

āˆ’2.16*

āˆ’1.50

āˆ’0.812

āˆ’0.593

āˆ’1.28

Education

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒ<High school

āˆ’1.76*

0.017

0.128

āˆ’0.431

āˆ’0.707

0.054

ā€ƒHigh school

āˆ’0.782*

0.009

āˆ’0.199

āˆ’0.055

āˆ’0.277

āˆ’0.031

ā€ƒCollege (ref)

Ā Ā Ā 

0.544

Ā Ā 

ā€ƒGraduate school

0.650

āˆ’0.17

0.028

Ā 

āˆ’0.561

0.193

Employment

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒUnemployment (ref)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒEmployed

āˆ’0.600

āˆ’0.447*

āˆ’0.052

0.320

āˆ’0.138

0.053

Income

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒ<$19,999 (ref)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒ$20,000ā€“49,999

0.482

āˆ’0.079

0.029

āˆ’0.779*

āˆ’0.453

āˆ’0.164

ā€ƒ$50,000ā€“74,000

1.15

āˆ’0.506

āˆ’0.304

āˆ’0.712

āˆ’1.02

0.584

ā€ƒā‰„$75,000

0.802

āˆ’0.206

āˆ’0.137

āˆ’0.565

āˆ’0.771

āˆ’0.848

Health insurance

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒUninsured (ref)

Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā 

ā€ƒPrivate

0.361

0.401

āˆ’0.178

āˆ’0.723

0.533

āˆ’0.398

ā€ƒMedicare

āˆ’0.159

0.138

āˆ’0.657

āˆ’0.702

0.225

āˆ’0.498

ā€ƒMedicaid

-.0737

0.999*

āˆ’0.261

āˆ’0.126

1.35*

0.873

ā€ƒMilitary

āˆ’0.082

āˆ’0.026

āˆ’0.820*

āˆ’0.121

0.235

0.139

ā€ƒOther insurance

āˆ’0.643

0.590

0.043

āˆ’0.617

0.576

0.358

R2

0.208

0.155

0.096

0.101

0.043

0.082

  1. *pā€‰<ā€‰0.05, **pā€‰<ā€‰0.001, refā€‰=ā€‰reference group
  2. Final model for each outcome after hierarchical models run entering variables in blocks based on theoretical relationships ā€“ first model included variables characterized as neighborhood problems, second block added variables characterized as neighborhood characteristics, third block added variables, characterized as access to healthy foods, fourth block added variables characterized as social support, and fifth block added sociodemographic variables