Development and feasibility of an automated call monitoring intervention for older wheelchair users: the MOvIT project

Table 1 Conceptual framework of the monitoring questionnaire

Dimensions from taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes	WC-related adverse outcomes tracked by the questionnaire	Source
EFFECTIVENESS: effect of assistive technology on domains of user functioning (ICF body functions, activity and participation) and effect of external influences on functioning and disability (ICF contextual factors)
Body functions
	-Pain/discomfort	Literature [9, 10, 50]
	-Skin problem	Literature [50–53]
	-Positioning problem	Literature [42, 50, 54]
	-WC incidents/accidents	Literature [15, 43, 45, 46, 50]
Activity and participation
	-Limited WC skills and knowledge	Literature [50, 55, 56]/End-users
	-Restricted WC participation	Literature [13, 57, 58]
Environmental factors
	-Reasons for non-use (weather conditions, home accessibility, transportation issues)	Literature [58]/End-users
SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING: includes users’ cognitive and affective evaluations of how assistive technology has affected their lives
Psychological functioning
	-Psychosocial distress	Literature [28–31, 59]/End-users
Satisfaction
	-Device dissatisfaction	Literature [32, 33, 60–62]/End-users
SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE: extent to which outcomes are important to society, primarily in terms of their economic effect
Device use
	-Frequency of device use in various environments	Literature [59, 63–65]/End-users
Service use
	-Device malfunction	Literature [16, 43, 44]/End-users

ISSN: 1472-6963