Skip to main content

Table 2 Respondents who believeda that adolescents would find it important that the physician would protect their confidentiality in a consultation on sexual and reproductive health issues, by survey year and socio-demographic characteristics

From: Changes in public attitudes towards confidential adolescent sexual and reproductive health services in Lithuania after the introduction of new legislation: findings from the cross-sectional surveys conducted in 2005 and 2012

 

2005 (N = 964)b

2012c (N = 852)b

p-value1

%

%

Total:

61.9

73.0

<0.001

Gender:

   

 Male

58.6

70.4

<0.001

 Female

65.0

75.1

0.001

 p-value2

0.042

0.123

 

Age:

   

 16–34

71.4

77.9

0.070

 35–54

60.9

72.7

0.001

 55–74

52.7

67.6

<0.001

 p-value

<0.001

0.029

 

Education:

   

 Basic or lower

56.7

68.7

0.024

 General (secondary)

64.6

74.5

0.012

 Further education

65.6

72.6

0.095

 University

57.6

74.3

<0.001

 p-value

0.241

0.743

 

Marital status:

   

 Married

62.6

72.0

0.002

 Single

70.4

77.8

0.097

 Divorced

47.6

72.6

0.001

 Widowed

50.0

69.0

0.016

 Unmarried cohabiting

62.9

72.3

0.361

 p-value

0.001

0.552

 

Employment status:

   

 Employed

63.5

75.5

<0.001

 Unemployed

60.0

70.2

0.001

 p-value

0.284

0.082

 

Income (per month and family person)

   

 Up to 500 litas3

62.5

74.4

0.011

 501 to 1,000 litas

59.0

68.9

0.010

 More than 1,000 litas

65.5

76.7

0.050

 p-value

0.477

0.112

 

Nationality:

   

 Lithuanian

62.3

72.6

<0.001

 Other nationality

60.5

77.2

0.014

 p-value

0.710

0.378

 

Population of community of residence:

  

 Up to 2,000

64.3

68.7

0.147

 2,000–180,000

63.5

73.2

0.007

 More than 180,000

57.7

77.2

<0.001

 p-value

0.179

0.072

 
  1. aThese respondents indicated a belief that it is ‘very important’ or ‘important’ for adolescents to obtain confidentiality when addressing physician on sexual and reproductive health issues. Other response options were ‘neither important nor not important’, ‘not important’ and ‘not important at all’
  2. btotal number of respondents who provided required responses
  3. cadjusted for gender, age and marital status in accordance with the survey in 2005
  4. 1comparing 2005 and 2012 within the same category (z test)
  5. 2comparing categories within the same year (Chi-squared test)
  6. 31 litas = €0.29
  7. p-values in bold indicate a statistically significant difference