Table 5 Alignment of Avahan TIs with government clinical and non-clinical norms at the time of transition
From: Management practices to support donor transition: lessons from Avahan, the India AIDS Initiative
Round 2 (2011) | Round 3 (2012) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Medium | High | Low | Medium | High | |
Is the NGO/CBO following the STI syndromic management guideline of NACO?1 | 15 % | 0 % | 85 % | 2 % | 13 % | 85 % |
Does the NGO/CBO procure STI syndromic management medicines as per NACO/SACS guidelines?2 | 37 % | 7 % | 56 % | 53 % | 9 % | 38 % |
Has there been any change in the condom procurement process?3 | 26 % | 7 % | 67 % | 15 % | 11 % | 74 % |
Has there been any change in the budget as per NACO/SACS guidelines?4 | 0 % | 7 % | 93 % | 2 % | 11 % | 87 % |
Has there been any change in the reporting format: are you sending reports to SACS/District AIDS Control Societies?5 | 0 % | 4 % | 96 % | 8 % | 2 % | 89 % |
Has there been any change in team structure: are you following SACS/NACO guidelines?6 | 0 % | 7 % | 93 % | 0 % | 4 % | 96 % |
How aligned is the present ratio of peer educators to high risk groups with the SACS norms?7 | 0 % | 4 % | 96 % | 0 % | 8 % | 92 % |