Skip to main content

Table 2 Pairwise statistical tests to determine (1) if trendline slopes for 2005–2009 DTCA data types were significantly different and (2) if magnitudes for 2005–2009 DTCA data types were significantly different after adjusting for effect of time

From: The rise of digital direct-to-consumer advertising?: Comparison of direct-to-consumer advertising expenditure trends from publicly available data sources and global policy implications

 

Statistic

TV vs. Print

TV vs. Radio

TV vs. Outdoor

TV vs. Internet

Trend

Δ (2nd minus 1st)

-$122,609,071

-$146,138,808

-$154,272,982

-$167,279,709

SEdiff

$94,728,227

$64,642,885

$64,409,125

$64,550,379

t

−1.2943

−2.2607

−2.3952

−2.5915

df

6

6

6

6

p

0.2431

0.0645

0.0536

0.0411

Magnitude

Δ (2nd minus 1st)

-$1,706,354,882

-$3,137,268,387

-$3,177,916,521

-$3,099,469,979

SEdiff

$140,278,912

$115,175,353

$117,948,373

$123,036,591

t

−12.164

−27.2391

−26.9433

−25.1914

df

7

7

7

7

p

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

Print vs. Radio

Print vs. Outdoor

Print vs. Internet

Radio vs. Outdoor

Radio vs. Internet

Outdoor vs. Internet

$23,529,737

-$31,663,911

-$44,670,638

-$8,134,174

-$21,140,901

-$13,006,727

$69,692,386

$69,475,618

$69,606,591

$5,668,070

$7,095,286

$4,491,759

0.3376

−0.4558

−0.6418

−1.4351

−2.9796

−2.8957

6

6

6

6

6

6

0.7471

0.6646

0.5448

0.2013

0.0247

0.0275

$1,430,913,505

-$1,471,561,639

-$1,393,115,097

-$40,648,133

$37,798,408

$78,446,542

$92,111,455

$92,526,092

$94,212,421

$8,601,111

$14,628,702

$9,106,204

15.5346

−15.9043

−14.787

−4.7259

2.5839

8.6146

7

7

7

7

7

7

<0.0001

<0.0001

<0.0001

0.0021

0.0363

<0.0001

  1. Note: TV expenditures reported exclude Spanish TV DTCA