Skip to main content

Table 1 Methodological rigour and risk of bias

From: High performing hospitals: a qualitative systematic review of associated factors and practical strategies for improvement

Study

Abstract and title

Introduction and aims

Method and data

Sampling

Data analysis

Ethics and bias

Findings/results

Transferability/generalizability

Implications and usefulness

Bradley et al. (2006) [10]

Fair

Good

Fair

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Poor

Mannion et al. (2005) [44]

Fair

Good

Fair

Fair

Good

Very poor

Fair

Fair

Fair

Sautter et al. (2007) [37]

Fair

Fair

Fair

Fair

Poor

Poor

Fair

Fair

Fair

Cherlin et al. (2013) [112]

Good

Good

Fair

Fair

Good

Poor

Good

Fair

Fair

Landman et al. (2013) [32]

Fair

Good

Fair

Fair

Good

Poor

Fair

Poor

Fair

Rangachari (2008) [31]

Fair

Fair

Fair

Fair

Fair

Poor

Fair

Poor

Fair

Baumann et al. (2007) [47]

Fair

Fair

Poor

Poor

Poor

Fair

Fair

Fair

Poor

Rose et al. (2012) [45]

Fair

Fair

Good

Fair

Fair

Very poor

Fair

Fair

Fair

Keroack et al. (2007) [34]

Fair

Good

Good

Fair

Good

Good

Fair

Good

Good

Hockey and Bates (2010) [42]

Fair

Poor

Poor

Fair

Poor

Poor

Fair

Poor

Fair

Adelman (2012) [41]

Poor

Good

Fair

Good

Good

Poor

Fair

Fair

Good

VanDeusen Lukas et al. (2010) [36]

Fair

Fair

Fair

Poor

Fair

Poor

Fair

Fair

Fair

Kramer et al. (2008) [40]

Fair

Poor

Very Poor

Poor

Very Poor

Fair

Very Poor

Very Poor

Poor

Parsons and Cornett (2011) [35]

Fair

Fair

Fair

Poor

Fair

Poor

Fair

Poor

Poor

Curry et al. (2011) [38]

Good

Fair

Good

Good

Good

Fair

Good

Good

Fair

Puoane et al. (2008) [33]

Good

Fair

Fair

Fair

Good

Good

Good

Fair

Good

Stanger et al. (2012) [43]

Fair

Good

Fair

Good

Fair

Very Poor

Fair

Fair

Good

Kane et al. (2009) [109]

Poor

Fair

Very Poor

Fair

Very Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Olson et al. (2011) [48]

Fair

Fair

Fair

Poor

Good

Fair

Fair

Fair

Fair