Skip to main content

Table 3 Confirmatory factor analysis and model comparison

From: Assessing the effects of pharmacists’ perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and turnover intention on provision of medication information at community pharmacies in Lithuania: a structural equation modeling approach

Model χ2(df) χ2(∆df) vs hypothesized model BIC AIC PNFI PCFI
M1: One-factor model 877.72(77)* 801.26(6)* 1038.43 933.72 0.52 0.54
M2: Two-factor model 395.94(76)* 319.48(5)* 562.39 453.94 0.69 0.71
M3: Three-factor model 245.06(74)* 168.6(3)* 422.99 307.06 0.73 0.75
M4: Four-factor (hypothesized) model 76.46(71)   271.62 144.46 0.75 0.78
M5: M4 with constrained H3, H4, and H6 (final model) 79.87(74) 3.41(3) 257.81 141.87 0.79 0.81
M6: Common Latent Factor controlled M5 79.87(73) 3.41(4) 263.54 143.87 0.77 0.80
  1. * p < 0.001.