Skip to main content

Table 3 Confirmatory factor analysis and model comparison

From: Assessing the effects of pharmacists’ perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and turnover intention on provision of medication information at community pharmacies in Lithuania: a structural equation modeling approach

Model

χ2(df)

χ2(∆df) vs hypothesized model

BIC

AIC

PNFI

PCFI

M1: One-factor model

877.72(77)*

801.26(6)*

1038.43

933.72

0.52

0.54

M2: Two-factor model

395.94(76)*

319.48(5)*

562.39

453.94

0.69

0.71

M3: Three-factor model

245.06(74)*

168.6(3)*

422.99

307.06

0.73

0.75

M4: Four-factor (hypothesized) model

76.46(71)

 

271.62

144.46

0.75

0.78

M5: M4 with constrained H3, H4, and H6 (final model)

79.87(74)

3.41(3)

257.81

141.87

0.79

0.81

M6: Common Latent Factor controlled M5

79.87(73)

3.41(4)

263.54

143.87

0.77

0.80

  1. * p < 0.001.