Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Identification of promising strategies to sustain improvements in hospital practice: a qualitative case study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jun 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Ament
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jun 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Ament
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jun 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Jul 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evelyn Cornelissen
3 Sep 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Saravana Kumar
6 Oct 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Ament
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Oct 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Ament
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Ament
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 6
25 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Stephanie Ament
Resubmission - Version 7
25 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
8 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
16 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/s12913-014-0641-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement