Skip to main content

Table 3 Decision types assessed, decision appropriateness assessment standards used, and decision appropriate analysis methods of 28 studies not included in the Chi-squared analyses

From: Perceived difficulty and appropriateness of decision making by General Practitioners: a systematic review of scenario studies

 

No. studies

Decision type a

Screening or testing

11

Diagnosisb

6

Treatment or management

22

Decision type sub-group a

Screening or testing

Test ordering

11

Examination

5

Treatment or management

Prescribing

18

Giving advice

5

Referral

8

Follow-up

4

Appointment-scheduling

0

Treatment other than prescribing

5

Method used for decision appropriateness assessment

Guidelines

14

Expert panel

5

Literature

3

Actual diagnosis

1

Combination

5

Method used to analyse decision appropriateness

Calculated agreement with decision appropriateness assessment standard

6

Calculated quality scores

5

Calculated mean proportion of appropriate or non-appropriate decisions

3

Decisions assessed on scales; mean scale ratings compared to decision appropriateness assessment standard

2

Calculated proportion of GPs making different decisions, but:

 

 • Data presented with those of other HCPs

4

 • Unclear specifically which options were appropriate/inappropriate

3

 • Focussed only on certain appropriate decisions

2

 • Data presented in graphs so cannot extract

1

 • Total number analysed not specified

1

 • Scenario results amalgamated with results from other questions

1

  1. Note: GP = General Practitioner; HCP = Health Care Professional.
  2. aStudies included in multiple categories if multiple decisions of different types made.
  3. bThe studies focussing on diagnostic decisions were not sub-categorised.