From: User perspectives on the Swedish Maternal Health Care Register
Response rate a | Values b | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Totally disagree | Totally agree | Summary of | ||||||
n (%) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | value 3 to 5 | |
1. Statements responded by all participating midwives (N = 989) | ||||||||
It is easy to get an overview | 947 (95.8) | 9 (0.9) | 21 (2.2) | 64 (6.8) | 261 (27.6) | 359 (37.9) | 233 (24.6) | 853 (90.1) |
It is easy to orient myself | 948 (95.9) | 8 (0.8) | 17 (1.8) | 60 (6.3) | 248 (26.2) | 390 (41.1) | 225 (23.7) | 863 (91.0) |
The start page has an appealing layout | 866 (87.6) | 33 (3.8) | 52 (6.0) | 134 (15.5) | 345 (39.8) | 196 (22.6) | 106 (12.2) | 646 (74.7) |
The colours are appealing | 844 (85.0) | 9 (1.1) | 35 (4.1) | 99 (11.7) | 295 (35.0) | 273 (32.3) | 133 (15.8) | 700 (83.0) |
The font is easy to read | 943 (95.0) | 3 (0.3) | 8 (0.8) | 33 (3.5) | 188 (19.9) | 397 (42.1) | 314 (33.3) | 898 (93.5) |
The text is easy to understand | 948 (95.9) | 3 (0.3) | 8 (0.8) | 30 (3.2) | 184 (19.4) | 428 (45.1) | 295 (31.1) | 907 (95.7) |
The font size works well | 947 (95.8) | 2 (0.2) | 2 (0.2) | 24 (2.5) | 144 (15.2) | 402 (42.4) | 373 (39.4) | 919 (97.0) |
I get the information I need about the register | 861 (87.1) | 19 (2.2) | 22 (2.5) | 68 (7.9) | 236 (27.4) | 328 (38.1) | 188 (21.8) | 752 (87.3) |
The Web- application functions well for registration | 943 (95.3) | 10 (1.1) | 14 (1.5) | 44 (4.7) | 187 (19.8) | 420 (44.5) | 268 (28.4) | 875 (92.8) |
Register manual | ||||||||
I have read the manual (proportion of “yes” answer) | 493 (51.5) | |||||||
The text is easy to understand | 462 (93.7) | 2 (0.4) | 2 (0.4) | 14 (3.0) | 126 (27.3) | 236 (51.2) | 82 (17.7) | 444 (96.1) |
The manual gave me the information I needed | 459 (93.1) | 3 (0.7) | 2 (0.4) | 17 (3.7) | 121 (26.4) | 219 (47.7) | 97 (21.1) | 437 (92.5) |
Registration of data at first data entry | ||||||||
The questions are easy to understand | 966 (97.7) | 3 (0.3) | 2 (0.2) | 12 (1.2) | 83 (8.6) | 379 (39.2) | 487 (50.4) | 949 (98.2) |
The questions come in a logical order | 918 (92.8) | 4 (0.4) | 4 (0.4) | 19 (2.1) | 117 (12.7) | 388 (42.3) | 386 (42.0) | 891 (97.1) |
Registration of data at second data entry | ||||||||
The questions are easy to understand | 953 (96.4) | 1 (0.1) | 2 (0.2) | 16 (1.7) | 128 (13.4) | 425 (44.6) | 381 (40.0) | 934 (98.0) |
The questions come in a logical order | 916 (92.6) | 2 (0.2) | 7 (0.8) | 22 (2.4) | 132 (14.4) | 412 (45.0) | 341 (37.2) | 885 (96.6) |
2. Statements responded by midwives in group A c (n = 880) d | ||||||||
I regularly access data on pregnant women who visit my clinic | 842 (95.7) | 481 (57.1) | 182 (21.6) | 99 (11.8) | 55 (6.5) | 11 (1.3) | 14 (1.7) | 80 (9.5) |
The register is helpful in my clinical work | 750 (85.2) | 289 (38.5) | 163 (21.7) | 118 (15.7) | 127 (16.9) | 32 (3.6) | 21 (2.8) | 180 (24.0) |
The register is burdensome | 843 (95.8) | 64 (7.6) | 78 (9.3) | 105 (12.5) | 215 (25.4) | 186 (21.9) | 197 (23.4) | 596 (70.7) |
I gain a more coherent picture of the pregnant woman by registering data in the register | 809 (91.9) | 285 (35.2) | 198 (24.5) | 131 (16.2) | 147 (18.2) | 36 (4.4) | 12 (1.5) | 195 (24.1) |
I question the benefit of the register | 789 (89.7) | 201 (25.5) | 148 (18.8) | 87 (11.0) | 158 (20.0) | 83 (10.5) | 112 (14.2) | 353 (44.7) |
3. Statements responded by midwives in group B e (n = 84) and C f (n = 24). In total n = 108 d | ||||||||
I regularly access data on pregnant women who visit my clinic | 99 (91.7) | 20 (20.2) | 11 (11.1) | 13 (13.1) | 22 (22.2) | 17 (17.2) | 16 (16.2) | 55 (55.6) |
The register is helpful in my clinical work | 85 (78.7) | 15 (17.6) | 6 (7.1) | 11 (12.9) | 24 (28.2) | 15 (17.6) | 14 (16.5) | 53 (62.4) |
The register is burdensome | 98 (90.7) | 19 (19.4) | 24 (24.5) | 18 (18.4) | 19 (19.4) | 12 (12.2) | 6 (6.1) | 37 (37.8) |
The register is helpful in my administrative work | 94 (87.0) | 17 (18.1) | 7 (7.4) | 8 (8.5) | 15 (16.0) | 28 (29.8) | 19 (20.2) | 62 (66.0) |
I gain a more coherent picture of the pregnant woman by registering data in the register | 80 (74.1) | 21 (26.3) | 8 (10.0) | 13 (16.3) | 18 (22.5) | 14 (17.5) | 6 (7.5) | 38 (47.5) |
I use register data in our operational planning | 91 (84.3) | 27 (29.7) | 11 (12.1) | 7 (7.7) | 13 (14.3) | 22 (24.2) | 11 (12.1) | 46 (50.5) |
I base financial decisions on data from the register | 79 (73.1) | 37 (46.8) | 8 (10.1) | 10 (12.7) | 14 (17.7) | 8 (10.1) | 2 (2.5) | 24 (30.4) |
I use register data to describe the burden of care for my clinic | 95 (88.0) | 24 (25.3) | 7 (7.4) | 12 (12.6) | 13 (13.7) | 23 (24.2) | 16 (16.8) | 52 (54.7) |
I use register data to compare my clinic with other levels of health care (regions, counties, Sweden) | 96 (88.9) | 22 (22.9) | 12 (12.5) | 12 (12.5) | 8 (8.3) | 24 (25.0) | 18 (18.8) | 50 (52.1) |
I present register data to my colleagues at the clinic | 96 (88.9) | 25 (26.0) | 10 (10.4) | 7 (7.3) | 14 (14.6) | 20 (20.8) | 20 (20.8) | 54 (56.3) |
I perceive my colleagues as interested in clinic data | 90 (83.3) | 15 (16.7) | 3 (3.3) | 12 (13.3) | 21 (23.3) | 24 (26.7) | 15 (16.7) | 60 (66.7) |
I provide register data to my supervisors | 95 (88.0) | 32 (33.7) | 11 (11.6) | 8 (8.4) | 9 (9.3) | 19 (20.0) | 16 (16.8) | 44 (46.3) |
I provide register data for development of health care | 84 (77.8) | 57 (67.9) | 13 (15.5) | 7 (8.3) | 5 (6.0) | 1 (1.2) | 1 (1.2) | 7 (8.3) |
I question the benefit of the register | 92 (85.2) | 52 (56.5) | 19 (20.7) | 4 (4.3) | 4 (4.3) | 3 (3.3) | 10 (10.9) | 17 (18.5) |