Skip to main content

Table 5 Annual per capita productivity loss estimates across three methods by size and industry

From: Work productivity loss from depression: evidence from an employer survey

  

Compensation

Disruption correction

Friction correction

By size

    

Less than or equal to 10% (n = 34)

Mean (SD)

469 (25)

494 (26)

207 (27)

Median (CI)+

470 (438 501)

494 (461 527)

207 (174 240)

 

Ratio++

NA

1.05

0.44

Greater than 10% and less than 90% (n = 261)

Mean (SD)

658 (88)

692 (92)

343 (67)

Median (CI)+

653 (549 782)

687 (578 822)

336 (259 436)

 

Ratio++

NA

1.05

0.51

Greater than or equal to 90% (n = 30)

Mean (SD)

393 (47)

415 (50)

173 (39)

Median (CI)+

396 (333 449)

418 (352 475)

172 (125 223)

 

Ratio++

NA

1.06

0.44

By industry

    

Education/Health (n = 40)

Mean (SD)

471 (47)

496 (49)

226 (39)

Median (CI)+

466 (414 536)

490 (436 564)

223 (178 274)

 

Ratio++

NA

1.05

0.48

Leisure/Hospitality (n = 43)

Mean (SD)

167 (13)

176 (14)

80 (11)

Median (CI)+

167 (149 184)

176 (157 193)

79 (67 93)

 

Ratio++

NA

1.05

0.47

Manufacturing (n = 73)

Mean (SD)

699 (120)

732 (125)

353 (86)

Median (CI)+

704 (529 855)

739 (557 894)

353 (237 471)

 

Ratio++

NA

1.05

0.50

Professional (n = 44)

Mean (SD)

643 (125)

672 (131)

257 (63)

Median (CI)+

592 (526 869)

619 (550 908)

245 (209 291)

 

Ratio++

NA

1.04

0.41

Public administration (n = 47)

Mean (SD)

687 (97)

727 (101)

391 (73)

Median (CI)+

683 (554 821)

723 (588 869)

392 (290 492)

 

Ratio++

NA

1.06

0.57

  1. SD = standard deviation, NA = not applicable, CI+ = 10th and 90th percentile of median, Ratio++ = ratio of disruption correction mean (or friction correction mean) to compensation mean.