Skip to main content

Table 5 Respondentsfrequency of use of cost effectiveness analysis

From: Key actors’ perspectives on cost-effectiveness analysis in Uganda: a cross-sectional survey

 

Always n (%)

Sometimes n (%)

Rarely or never n (%)

How often have you been involved in doing CEA?**

3 (3.2)

24 (25.3)

68 (71.6)

How often have you (personally) had to interpret CEA during your practice or decision making?

6 (6.4)

41 (43.6)

47 (50.0)

How frequently do you read an article (s) that compares the cost effectiveness of two or more interventions?

2 (2.1)

50 (53.2)

42 (44.7)

In the past 12 months, have you considered cost effectiveness analysis results when making decisions during your clinical practice?

10 (10.6)

39 (41.5)

45 (47.9)

In the past 12 months, have you considered cost effectiveness analysis results when formulating any policies?

10 (10.7)

32 (34)

52 (53.3)

How often do you involve CEA in discussing policy or practice at your school or place of work?

8 (8.5)

50 (53.2)

36 (38.3)

How often have you been involved in reviewing CEA?

2 (2.1)

26 (27.7)

66 (70.2)

  1. **Proportions based on N =95, due to one missing data value all the other proportions in the table are based on N = 94.