Skip to main content

Table 5 Social determinants of FPS use of FP and RP

From: Reproductive health service use and social determinants among the floating population: a quantitative comparative study in Guangzhou City

Social determinants of FPS use

FP

RP

OR(95% CI)

P-value

OR(95% CI)

P-value

Gender

 

<0.001*

 

<0.001*

  Female

1

 

1

 

  Male

0.208(0.108 ~ 0.401)

 

0.208(0.108 ~ 0.401)

 

Marital status

 

0.001*

 

0.001*

  Married

1

 

1

 

  Unmarried

0.267(0.120 ~ 0.596)

 

0.267(0.120 ~ 0.596)

 

SES level

 

0.459

 

0.459

  High

1

 

1

 

  Middle

1.600(0.744 ~ 3.441)

 

1.600(0.744 ~ 3.441)

 

  Low

1.692(0.673 ~ 4.255)

 

1.692(0.673 ~ 4.255)

 

RH needs

 

<0.001*

 

<0.001*

  No

1

 

1

 

  Yes

3.246(1.683 ~ 6.260)

 

3.246(1.683 ~ 6.260)

 

RH skill for contraception

 

0.655

 

0.655

  Poor

1

 

1

 

  Middle

1.240(0.359 ~ 4.280)

 

1.240(0.359 ~ 4.280)

 

  Good

1.582(0.445 ~ 5.617)

 

1.582(0.445 ~ 5.617)

 

Attendance in RH lectures

 

<0.001*

 

<0.001*

  No

1

 

1

 

  Yes

3.113(1.920 ~ 5.048)

 

3.113(1.920 ~ 5.048)

 

RH care awareness

 

0.015*

 

0.015*

  Poor

1

 

1

 

  Middle

7.183(1.790 ~ 28.821)

 

7.183(1.790 ~ 28.821)

 

  Good

5.303(1.227 ~ 22.918)

 

5.303(1.227 ~ 22.918)

 

RH skill for pregnancy test

 

<0.001*

 

<0.001*

  Poor

1

 

1

 

  Middle

2.837(1.396 ~ 5.767)

 

2.837(1.396 ~ 5.767)

 

  Good

4.981(2.395 ~ 10.359)

 

4.981(2.395 ~ 10.359)

 

Knowledge of the FPSC location

 

0.049*

 

0.049*

  No

1

 

1

 

  Yes

2.141(1.002 ~ 4.572)

 

2.141(1.002 ~ 4.572)

 

Number of children under five years in the family

0.949(0.523 ~ 1.722)

0.863

0.949(0.523 ~ 1.722)

0.863

  1. *P ≤0.05 indicates a statistical significance.