TY - JOUR AU - Feiring, Eli AU - Ugstad, Kristian N. PY - 2014 DA - 2014/10/25 TI - Interpretations of legal criteria for involuntary psychiatric admission: a qualitative analysis JO - BMC Health Services Research SP - 500 VL - 14 IS - 1 AB - The use of involuntary admission in psychiatry may be necessary to enable treatment and prevent harm, yet remains controversial. Mental health laws in high-income countries typically permit coercive treatment of persons with mental disorders to restore health or prevent future harm. Criteria intended to regulate practice leave scope for discretion. The values and beliefs of staff may become a determinating factor for decisions. Previous research has only to a limited degree addressed how legal criteria for involuntary psychiatric admission are interpreted by clinical decision-makers. We examined clinicians' interpretations of criteria for involuntary admission under the Norwegian Mental Health Care Act. This act applies a status approach, whereby involuntary admission can be used at the presence of mental disorder and need for treatment or perceived risk to the patient or others. Further, best interest assessments carry a large justificatory burden and open for a range of extra-legislative factors to be considered. SN - 1472-6963 UR - https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0500-x DO - 10.1186/s12913-014-0500-x ID - Feiring2014 ER -